Kansas Economic Freedom Index

by Bob Weeks on February 24, 2011

Here are the current versions of the Kansas Economic Freedom Index for the Senate and House of Representatives. The index was last updated on February 24, 2011.

The purpose of the Kansas Economic Freedom Index is to identify Kansas legislators who vote in favor of economic freedom — and those who don’t.

Economic freedom is an end in itself, and is an indispensable means toward the achievement of political freedom, according to Milton Friedman. For more on economic freedom, click on The importance of economic freedom.

In the index, each bill has a weight. This is a number from 1 to 10, with 10 meaning the bill is of greatest importance. When calculating the index value for a legislator, the index adds up the weights for the bills being considered, and add up the weights the legislator “earned” based on their votes, performs the calculation. When a legislator votes “Absent,” the vote is not included in that legislator’s calculation.

The vote that is in favor of economic freedom might be “Yea” in some cases, and “Nay” in others. For each vote, the index indicates which is the vote for economic freedom.

Links to current versions for the 2011 legislative session:
Kansas Economic Freedom Index, Senate
Kansas Economic Freedom Index, House of Representatives


Find us on Facebook

{ 1 comment }

The importance of economic freedom

by Bob Weeks on February 24, 2011

Why is economic freedom important? Here’s what Milton Friedman had to say in the opening chapter of his monumental work Capitalism and Freedom some 50 years ago:

The Relation between Economic Freedom and Political Freedom

It is widely believed that politics and economics are separate and largely unconnected; that individual freedom is a political problem and material welfare an economic problem; and that any kind of political arrangements can be combined with any kind of economic arrangements. The chief contemporary manifestation of this idea is the advocacy of “democratic socialism” by many who condemn out of hand the restrictions on individual freedom imposed by “totalitarian socialism” in Russia, and who are persuaded that it is possible for a country to adopt the essential features of Russian economic arrangements and yet to ensure individual freedom through political arrangements. The thesis of this chapter is that such a view is a delusion, that there is an intimate connection between economics and politics, that only certain arrangements are possible and that, in particular, a society which is socialist cannot also be democratic, in the sense of guaranteeing individual freedom.

Economic arrangements play a dual role in the promotion of a free society. On the one hand, freedom in economic arrangements is itself a component of freedom broadly understood, so economic freedom is an end in itself. In the second place, economic freedom is also an indispensable means toward the achievement of political freedom.

For more about Friedman and his thoughts on economic freedom, see Milton Friedman, the Father of Economic Freedom.

Economic freedom is the most important factor in determining the well-being of people across the world. Where economic freedom exists, countries become wealthy. In introducing the Economic Freedom of the World report, its authors write: “Economic freedom has been shown in numerous peer-reviewed studies to promote prosperity and other positive outcomes. It is a necessary condition for democratic development. It liberates people from dependence on government in a planned economy, and allows them to make their own economic and political choices.”

One of the authors of the Economic Freedom of the World report, Robert Lawson, expands on the importance of economic freedom: “The big question is: Do countries that exhibit greater degrees of economic freedom perform better than those that do not? Much scholarly research has been and continues to be done to see if the index [of economic freedom] correlates with various measures of the good society: higher incomes, economic growth, income equality, gender equality, life expectancy, and so on. While there is scholarly debate about the exact nature of these relationships, the results are uniform: measures of economic freedom relate positively with these factors.

Economic freedom is important to the states, too. In the 2009 report Freedom in the 50 States: An Index of Personal and Economic Freedom, researchers found that “… states enjoying more economic and personal freedom tend to attract substantially higher rates of internal net migration.” In measures of economic and personal freedom, Kansas ranks relatively well among the states, but lags behind some neighboring states. Actions by the Kansas legislature in 2010 might drive its ranking down, were the index to be recomputed.

{ 0 comments }

Kansas legislative scorecards

by Bob Weeks on February 24, 2011

Kansans need to know the true voting record of members of the legislature. Legislative scorecards or ratings can be a valuable resource for learning about the actions and record of legislators.

These ratings are valuable because they record what a legislator actually does. Sometimes that’s different from what legislators say they do.

Producing a meaningful rating is difficult. You need to find votes that discriminate between political positions, as including a bill where the vote was 115 to 3 provides little discriminative value. Sometimes there are procedural votes leading up to final passage, and it may be these somewhat obscure votes that provide the ability to meaningfully distinguish political positions.

Through the 2008 legislative session, Karl Peterjohn of the Kansas Taxpayers Network produced scorecards. After Peterjohn was elected to the Sedgwick County Commission in 2008, KTN merged with the Kansas Chapter of Americans For Prosperity. AFP produced ratings for the 2009 and 2010 session. Also, the Kansas Economic Freedom Index produces legislative ratings.

Following are the scorecards for recent sessions.

Kansas Senate

Kansas Senate Legislative Scorecard 2010
Kansas Senate Legislative Scorecard 2009
Kansas Senate Legislative Scorecard 2008
Kansas Senate Legislative Scorecard 2007
Kansas Senate Legislative Scorecard 2005
Kansas Senate Legislative Scorecard 2004
Kansas Senate Legislative Scorecard 2003
Kansas Senate Legislative Scorecard 2001
Kansas Senate Legislative Scorecard 2000
Kansas Senate Legislative Scorecard 1999
Kansas Senate Legislative Scorecard 1998
Kansas Senate Legislative Scorecard 1997
Kansas Senate Legislative Scorecard 1996

Kansas House of Representatives

Kansas House Legislative Scorecard 2010
Kansas House Legislative Scorecard 2009
Kansas House Legislative Scorecard 2008
Kansas House Legislative Scorecard 2007
Kansas House Legislative Scorecard 2005
Kansas House Legislative Scorecard 2004
Kansas House Legislative Scorecard 2003
Kansas House Legislative Scorecard 2001
Kansas House Legislative Scorecard 2000
Kansas House Legislative Scorecard 1999
Kansas House Legislative Scorecard 1998
Kansas House Legislative Scorecard 1997
Kansas House Legislative Scorecard 1996

{ 0 comments }

Kansas Economic Freedom Index, 2010

by Bob Weeks on February 24, 2011

Here are final versions of the Kansas Economic Freedom Index for the Senate and House of Representatives for 2010. The index was last updated on May 25, 2010; see Kansas Economic Freedom Index updated for remarks.

The purpose of the Kansas Economic Freedom Index is to identify Kansas legislators who vote in favor of economic freedom — and those who don’t.

Economic freedom is an end in itself, and is an indispensable means toward the achievement of political freedom, according to Milton Friedman. For more on economic freedom, click on The importance of economic freedom.

In the index, each bill has a weight. This is a number from 1 to 10, with 10 meaning the bill is of greatest importance. When I calculate the index value for a legislator, I add up the weights for the bills being considered, and add up the weights the legislator “earned” based on their votes, and that’s the basis of the calculation.

When a legislator votes “Absent,” the vote is not included in that legislator’s calculation. While some have suggested that I attempt to distinguish between excused absences and other absences, and that I ask legislators with excused absences what their vote would have been had they not been absent, this seems unworkable.

The vote that is in favor of economic freedom might be “Yea” in some cases, and “Nay” in others. For each vote, I indicate what is the vote for economic freedom.

Links to final versions for the 2010 legislative session:
Kansas Economic Freedom Index, Senate
Kansas Economic Freedom Index, House of Representatives

For an archive of similar projects from years past, see Kansas legislative scorecards, rankings.


Find us on Facebook

{ 0 comments }